Top Stories
E-Edition
A digital version of the printed newspaper that's available exclusively to subscribers
    Contributors
  • Trial Notebook

    TNB-07-20-18,ph02
    Justices Thomas M. Harris and John W. Turner disagreed on whether Wayne Patterson’s decision to voluntarily dismiss his fourth amended counterclaim for conversion against Dennis Brooks and R. Mack Brown provided jurisdictional justification for their appeal to the Illinois Appellate Court from an order that denied their motion for summary judgment on the tort claim.
  • Lawyers' Forum

    Attorneys and accountants are undergoing a seismic shift from being technical specialists to business problem-solvers. Professional services marketers share their perspective and advice to others facing this challenge.
  • Lawyers' Forum

    The most effective mediation submissions tell a concise, compelling story in clear, simple language. It’s easier to write a submission with a checklist of what to include because a submission is nuanced, and it’s not the same as writing a brief for trial.
  • Workplace Issues

    Mark-DeBofsky-forum-7-18-18,ph02
    A recent ruling issued by U.S. District Judge Carlton W. Reeves of the Southern District of Mississippi described a history and pattern of bad-faith disability benefit claim denials.
  • Lawyers' Forum

    A recent article in The New York Times highlights a growing problem — funding of litigation by investment companies that are not otherwise involved in, or parties to, the litigation.
  • Federal Courts

    Jay-Judge-forum-7-17-18,ph02
    Today’s case offers guidance in presenting evidence in a Social Security disability claim before an administrative law judge using the standard five-step test to evaluate conflicting medical testimony on the nature and extent of the claimant’s alleged disability.
©2018 by Law Bulletin Media. Content on this site is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, or retransmitting of any copyright-protected material. The content is NOT WARRANTED as to quality, accuracy or completeness, but is believed to be accurate at the time of compilation. Websites for other organizations are referenced at this site; however, the Law Bulletin does not endorse or imply endorsement as to the content of these websites. By using this site you agree to the Terms, Conditions and Disclaimer. Law Bulletin Media values its customers and has a Privacy Policy for users of this website.