This is the first of a three-part series. Part two will be available Wednesday.Increasingly troubled by questions about whether the U.S. Supreme Court’s “current standing doctrine — and especially its injury-in-fact requirement — is properly grounded in the Constitution’s text and history, coherent in theory, or workable in practice,” Circuit Judge Kevin C. Newsom, adding a lengthy concurring opinion to a decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, proposed two major …