Where a defendant is arrested and a weapon seized in his immediate vicinity in a house in which he has no expectation of privacy and the arrest is later found to be unlawful, the defendant’s lack of privacy interest in the location does not change that the weapon must be suppressed as fruit of the unlawful arrest.The 1st District Appellate Court reversed the decision of Cook County Associate Judge Lawrence E. Flood.Markell Horton was arrested after two Chicago police officers on patrol noticed a “metallic …