An insurance exclusion that doesn’t specify regular, wage-earning workers can still apply to these people, an appeals court has ruled.A split 1st District Appellate Court this week ruled that despite language limiting the definition of “employee” to six specific types of nontraditional workers, the commonly understood meaning of the word and the context in which it was used suggest traditional employees are included in to the policy.The context is a commercial general liability, or CGL, policy. Such …