A federal appeals court revived some of the civil rights claims brought by an Indiana man who was wrongfully convicted of a triple murder, partly because of faulty forensic analysis at the crime scene.David Camm’s claim that the first warrant for his arrest violated his Fourth Amendment rights by relying on now-discredited blood splatter analysis can proceed to trial, a panel of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week.“[N]o reasonable investigator would think that a verbal description of blood …