Fourth Amendment — search and seizure, urine test

Posted February 21, 2018 12:49 PM

Where a defendant brought to the hospital by the police is found to have an altered mental state and blood and urine tests are ordered by the supervising physician, those tests do not constitute state action and are not subject to Fourth Amendment protection, even if officers are called in to help restrain the defendant by the nurse performing the test.The 1st District Appellate Court affirmed the decision of Cook County Associate Judge Jeffrey L. Warnick.Ladina Sykes and her two children spent the evening of Aug. 19, 2013 …

To Read the Full Story

Your source for legal news and information

Print & Digital Access

Stay in the know all year long with these benefits:

Delivery to your office in downtown Chicago or mailed outside our hand-delivery zone.
Unlimited access to chicagolawbulletin.com.
Access to our e-edition and mobile site.
Breaking news alerts, Morning Lineup and Afternoon Headlines.
Exclusive access to events, discounts and more.

Order now, or call 312-644-2394 or email Subscription@LawBulletinMedia.com for details.

Be in the know. These must-read insider briefings will keep you

informed of the latest legal developments in Chicago. Sign up today!

Civil procedure — mootness

Where a petition for involuntary treatment is granted the petition may be reviewed even after the treatment has ended if it may recur or there is a public interest in settling the issue.
Civil procedure — standing

Where plaintiffs alleged economic harm based on theoretical risk of injury from potentially contaminated infant formula, theory was not sufficient to confer Article III standing.
Civil law — apparent agency

Where plaintiff receives a consent form indicating that their treating physician is not an agent of the hospital, this is not dispositive of an apparent agency relationship.
Civil law — shareholder derivative action

Where plaintiffs file a shareholder derivative action they must allege facts that provide reasonable doubt as to whether the board of directors could exercise independent and disinterested judgment.
Immigration — asylum, nexus

Where petitioner failed to show nexus between her past persecution and membership in protected group, petition for review of decision denying asylum and withholding of removal was denied.
Criminal procedure — pretrial release

Where defendant is arrested and released with instructions to appear for a court date, he is on pretrial release even though he has not yet appeared before the court.
Civil procedure — subject matter jurisdiction

Where a party seeks mandamus to enforce an administrative decision, he must have exhausted all administrative remedies or the circuit court will not have subject matter jurisdiction.
Civil procedure — standing

Where plaintiff’s argument for standing concerned events that occurred four months after complaint was filed, those events could not support standing.